Connect with us

ENGLISH

World Anti-Crisis Conference will take place in Astana on 22-24 May 2013

Published

on

Under the auspices of the UN, the World Anti-crisis Conference (WAC) will take place in Astana on 23-24 May 2013. The idea of ​​the World Anti-Crisis conference was introduced by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev, and was supported by members of the “Dialogue of leaders” at the Vth  Astana Economic Forum. Political leaders, ministers of finance and economy, heads of central banks of the UN member countries, as well as business representatives and heads of international and financial organizations will discuss possible ways out of the global economic crisis and work on a draft of the UN World Anti-Crisis plan.

WAC events, 23rd May 2013

Panel session 1A DECADE OF REGULATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE EUROZONE: POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC DIMENSION

Questions for discussion: Should countries of Europe pursue the policy of austerity? What is the right balance between fiscal consolidation and growth? What are the political consequences? How faster economic growth may be achieved? Before the crisis of the Eurozone, besides single currency and fiscal constraints, institutional architecture of the European Monetary Union was minimalist: the management of economic and financial policy was firmly based on national competence. At the moment, the question is how to strengthen the architecture of the European Monetary Union? How can the transition to an effective and sustainable monetary union be achieved?

Panel session 2ASSESSMENT OF MONETARY POLICY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL STABILITY

Questions for discussion: What is the effectiveness and possible risks of ‘non-standard’ monetary policy measures? Is the world in a state of severe “currency wars”? Is currency depreciation a current trend? Is there a reconfiguration of the role of monetary policy in the Western world? How significant is the concept of independence of Central Banks today? What will be the best exit from unconventional monetary measures for the US, UK and Japan? How will the rest of the world cope with external effects? How should central banks of developing countries respond to the developed countries’ strategy? Does the current drop in gold price impact upon the aggregate balance of the central banks of developed countries?

Panel session 3 GLOBAL CAPITAL MARKETS IN TRANSITION: CHANGES OF THE FINANCIAL LANDSCAPE

Questions for discussion: How will the global economic and financial landscape develop? Is there a trend of increasing disintermediation and an important role of capital markets in the global financial system? Will the global financial system ultimately become more important in the global economy? How to counter the risks of fragmentation and secondary re-nationalization of financial systems? There is a growth in emerging markets and the growing importance of capital markets with the development of local bond markets in local currency and the deepening of the financial sector. Will this trend continue?

WAC events, 24th May 2013

Round table 1– NEW WORLD FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE

Problems caused by the crisis raised questions about the traditional foundations of global economic governance. How could the global economic governance be strengthened in the future?

Round table 2G20: ADAPTING TO NEW REALITIES OF THE WORLD ECONOMY (outreach event of the Russian Presidency of G20).

Under the presidency of Russia in the G20, a critical challenge is what the G20 could offer to help the global economic recovery. In this context, how could the G20 find solutions to change traditional views on investment flows and their impact on the growth of various economic centers of the world?

Round table 3 – RECOVERY OF GROWTH IN A MORE FRAGMENTED WORLD ECONOMY.

The crisis caused the process of the ‘great balance change in the global economy’.  Is there progress in the balance change of the key world economies: China, the U.S. and the Eurozone? Is this a cyclical or a structural process? Is the world economy deviating? What will be the end of this process?

Round table 4: ADOPTING RESOLUTIONS OF THE WORLD ANTI-CRISIS CONFERENCE

WAC speakers and participants: Nursultan Nazarbayev, President of Kazakhstan; Vuk Jeremic, President of the UN General Assembly; Wu Hongbo, Deputy Secretary General of the UN and the Head of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs; Supachai Panitchpakdi, Secretary-General of the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD); political leaders (presidents, prime ministers), business representatives, heads of international organizations (World Bank, IMF).

ENGLISH

MEP Vasile Blaga: EU must create solid programs in order to rebuild the labor market

Published

on

©Vasile Blaga/ Facebook

MEP Vasile Blaga, a member of the EPP Group in the European Parliament, stresses that the European Union must create solid programs for consolidating and rebuilding the labor market after the COVID-19 period.

“Economic data for the second quarter of 2020 show a worrying decline in the labor market across the European Union. In Romania, the number of closed employment contracts has increased alarmingly – we are approaching one million closed employment contracts, and the number of closed contracts on 15 July is double compared to 1st June 2020. The most affected sectors are manufacturing and it is possible that in the next period we will see a massive increase in contracts in the hospital industry, still affected by the restrictions generated by the pandemic “, said the MEP for Calea Europeană media platform.

According to the Liberal MEP, protecting jobs must be the number one priority for the European Union.

“It is clear that the European Union must be massively concerned with protecting existing jobs and financially stimulating the creation of new ones ”, he added.

Private sector employment must also be a priority for the European Commission: “Direct funding through various forms of private sector employment must be a priority for the Commission in the next period, complemented by the stimulation of sectors severely affected by pandemic – the hospitality industry and the arts and entertainment sector are a priority in this regard “, said the EPP MEP Vasile Blaga.

Continue Reading

ENGLISH

MEP Vasile Blaga: The European Parliament was divided between East and West in the vote for the Mobility Package

Published

on

© Vasile Blaga/Facebook

MEP Vasile Blaga (PNL, EPP) points out that the European Parliament was divided between East and West in the vote for the Mobility Package during the week’s plenary session and criticizes protectionism in a market declared “free”.

“The East lost the vote even if, this time, the ideological separations were erased and it voted in corpore for the defense of the rights of the eastern carriers. All amendments tabled to address some of the discriminatory provisions contained in the legislative proposal have been rejected. Anyone with common sense understands that thousands of trucks that drive even empty every eight weeks to the country where they are registered are a major source of pollution, a substantial addition to traffic, and an aberrant waste of resources. Some provisions appear to be dedicated to Eastern carriers, which do nothing but operate fairly and honestly in a freely competitive market. In essence, protectionism is practiced in a market declared free “, the MEP said in a press release.

The Liberal MEP hopes that the analysis of the European Executive will turn the whole process upside down: “There is still hope that the European Executive will show the truth in the impact analysis it has to carry out by the end of the year “, added Vasile Blaga.

Continue Reading

ENGLISH

EC Communication chief warns: Disinformation is a real threat to public health during COVID-19 crisis

Published

on

Disinformation has presented itself as a real threat to public health during the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, Pia Ahrenkilde Hansen, the head of the DG Communication of the European Commission, said on Wednesday.

During the conference “Communicating Europe: corona, recovery and beyond”  the director of CaleaEuropeană.ro platform, Dan Cărbunaru, asked the Director-General of DG Communication of the European Executive, regarding the European Union instruments used in the hybrid warfare, but also how the European Commission intends to act through its expertise against misinformation and to protect the citizens against fears.

Pia Ahrenkilde Hansen, as Director-General DG Communication, explained to CaleaEuropeană.ro the steps that the European executive has taken, in order to take effective measures against disinformation and mitigate the real threat to public health.

 

Dan Cărbunaru: ”As you finished your presentation, initially, talking about misinformation, I would like to ask you something about it, because each crisis that hit Europe was treated as an opportunity usually to develop new tools for providing an increased European approach in solving European citizens problems. And in the last years, we saw the pressure, we felt the pressure heavily put by the propaganda and the tools of hybrid war. And my question for you is, as we know that we have some tools; EU is stuck on the task force, for instance, do you intend does the Commission intend to protect the public’s fears, using this expertise, this kind of expertise already, let’s say tested in combat, and which is on the European Union, the major risk identified so far in terms of hybrid war in Europe.”

Pia Ahrenkilde Hansen: Thank you very much for this very important question.

”Of course indeed as you also stressed there are several actors in this at the institutional level in the European Union. You are right,  that it’s absolutely something that has grown very rapidly since the beginning of the crisis, and it has continued to spread, as we saw the crisis the coronavirus crisis, playout and indeed, it has been playing very much on people’s fears, in relation to this particular crisis and, and the increased use of social media. And it has, in the context of the coronavirus crisis, it has really even presented a real threat to public health, as well as, indeed, and that’s not new. Those who have propagated this information have taken advantage of the situation to sometimes push political agendas. As far as the action that we have been taken. We have definitely reverted also in this crisis many myths, a lot of misinformation because there’s misinformation and then there’s disinformation this deliberate malign attempt to manipulate opinion and information, but I mentioned, everything that has been circulating about the health aspects of the disease, of course, or the, the disease itself or the treatments or the vaccines I referred to it already, as well as also. And there are, indeed, some foreign actors have come in as well. When it comes to the perceived lack of EU response or perceived lack of solidarity.

Our president was very conscious of this from an early moment and asked us to have as part of this website that she asked us to create, to communicate what Europe is doing to fight the coronavirus crisis. She also asked us to have a disinformation section there.

So that we actually in all languages, and in a format that makes it very easy also to share these stories setting the record straight if you like on social media.

This is one part of the, of the strategy, it is of course to provide the stories, and the facts in a very accessible way also when it comes to the crisis but in a broader frame when it comes to dealing with this information it’s also about informing and educating the public about this disinformation itself, how it works as a phenomenon, and indeed the danger that it poses in this case both to public health, and to democracy, and this is something that this commission is also very concerned about, you will have heard our vice president Jurova also in addition to the president herself and other members of the college have been very strongly voicing their concern in this area. So, communicating actually very actively and regularly, about how you actually identify disinformation, and how a typical online user can protect himself from disinformation is also part of the response. So, without having the time to go into all the details, a very multifaceted approach is needed. Also involving working with platforms as we do and we have done for some time now, such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and since this month, also Tick Tock on developing standards to maintain the online information environment clean from harmful misinformation and disinformation.

And then we have our code of practice which is actually the first of its kind of a self-regulatory effort in this area which is definitely called upon to grow even more important and ambitious as we as we go along, and we will see to which extent, it needs to be complemented with with with regulation.

We also need to fund, and that’s what we’re doing, we’re funding researchers and civil society organizations that are dedicated to studying also the phenomenon of disinformation and to finding solutions and, and fact-checking is also very independent fact-checking of course it’s not something we do, but we support it, as well as developing new technologies we will also be able to be helped by artificial intelligence in this respect, definitely. And therefore, and then also protecting elections and public information to do this.

You refer to the EEAS and it’s true that the EEAS has played a truly a crucial role in fighting disinformation as a foreign policy threat, you refer to that and that has expanded to now, including more teams that are focusing on different regions outside the EU, where this information might originate, and you will find in relation to the corona crisis, which quite comprehensive information on where we are stepping up the action, and this includes also doing more on social media in the debate and the Member States.

On the 10th of June when we published a document on how we intend to step up the action and learn the lessons, from the coronavirus crisis when it comes to disinformation. But by the end of the day, it’s also about building trust in institutions having a strong communications environment, and this support to independent media that I mentioned, in addition to because it happens, it starts with ourselves and how do we actually explain things that we know to our friends and families and how do we think about sharing social media posts that we see, this is something that all of us have to pay very much attention to. So, checking your sources and thinking before sharing I think is also the part of the reflex that everyone needs to embrace so promoting that is very important as well.”


OpenEUDebate is a Jean Monnet network of academic institutions (Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain; the National University of Political and Administrative Studies – SNSPA, Romania; Institut d’études européennes de l’Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium; The Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium and Agenda Pública, Spain.
”We intend to create a self-sustainable network of experts of varying degrees of seniority working as mediators with national communities of beneficiaries and users that will influence the public debate. The OpenEUdebate community will address two types of fragmentation: between the local-national and the European public sphere, and between specialized knowledge and public debate.”
OpenEUDebate ”will be an accessible and inclusive community where issues are debated critically with a wide range of views. It will “translate” expert knowledge (about contents and procedures) into relevant information for public debate; it will explain the terms of its politicization (above partisan lines); and will enhance the level of public deliberation about it.”
Pia Ahrenkilde Hansen sits at the meeting point of EU communications and policy. She has been Director-General of DG Communication (COMM) since March 2019 and has been overseeing the communication around the European Commission’s response to the coronavirus crisis. Previous roles have included Deputy Secretary-General of the European Commission and Chief Spokesperson of the European Commission. She holds a Master of Science in International Business Administration and Modern Languages, Copenhagen Business School, with a dissertation on European Identity.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending