While East Europeans are being taught lessons of anti-corruption, problems are rising under the slightest sense of carelessness, and Europe as a whole, together with its citizens, will discount the effects, MEP Ramona Mănescu warned in an analysis signed for Calea Europeană, highlighting corruption issues faced by other European countries, not just Romania.
The analysis comes as the European Parliament voted on Tuesday a resolution on the rule of law in Romania and after EP adopted on Wednesday a resolution in which the European legislature calls on the Commission to adopt a “comprehensive mechanism for democracy, rule of law and fundamental rights” .
“In 2004, European Commissioner for Enlargement, Gunter Verheugen, speaking before the European Parliament about the state of play of EU enlargement towards Romania and Bulgaria said that he hoped that “justice would get to do its job properly” and that “big fish will also get behind the bars, not just the less important ones.” It has been 14 years since then and Romania brought to justice a bunch of fish, both large and small.
Meanwhile, beyond the borders of Romania, in the rest of the European Union, things seem to be not less than perfect. Citizens’ perception of corruption, from countries like Germany, the Netherlands or Denmark, confirms this.
Then why is the European Parliament trying, for the second time since 2016, to convince the European Commission of the “Need for a Comprehensive Mechanism for Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights”? We understand that the 54% of the Dutch, who say that corruption is a rarity in their country, are wrong.
The document I just voted Thursday, together with my colleagues I draw attention to a reality that the Commission, supported by a number of highly influential Member States, ignores it. Paragraph N says: “Previous anti-corruption reports at EU level and 2018 country reports in the European Semester show that corruption in several Member States raises serious concerns, eroding the trust of citizens in institutions and the rule of law.”
The resolution lets us can guess a much more serious situation, which Brussels, Berlin, Amsterdam or Paris are not willing to admit publicly. While Eastern Europeans are taught lessons of anti-corruption, the problems accumulate under a thick layer of indifference, and Europe as a whole, along with its citizens, will take the toll.
What are we talking about? The best example is the current scandal involving Danske Bank, Denmark’s largest commercial bank with a 150-year-old tradition, “a giga scandal” as Margrethe Vestager, the Danish European Commissioner for Competition, described it. This scandal began with the opening of a money laundering investigation, which involves more than €200 billion, through a branch of Danske Bank in Estonia. Black money come from Russia and are connected both with President Putin’s family and with Russian intelligence.
Unfortunately, this scandal is not the only one of its kind. It comes after the case involving ING, the largest Dutch bank. This dossier was finalized in 2018 with a fine of $ 900 million for money laundering (which happened between 2010 and 2016). One of the accuses in the case of ING, VimpelCom (VEON now), a company controlled by Altimo, which belongs to Russian oligarch Mikhail Fridman, transferred through ING $ 114 million bribe in Uzbekistan for access to the local telecoms market.
Another recent case concerns Deutsche Bank, the largest bank in Germany. It has agreed to pay a $ 630 million fine in 2017 for laundering $ 10 billion, money also coming from Russia.
Similarly, BNP Paribas, France’s largest bank, and the $ 8.9 billion fine for money laundering (2014) in Sudan, Iran and Cuba, cannot be overlooked. Three years later, BNP Paribas paid another fine of € 10 million for lack of interest in implementing anti-money laundering measures.
All of these scandals have ended with lawyers’ agreements, the recognition of charges and the payment of penalties.
A legitimate question is: how deep the investigations went in these cases? Also, has been clarified the suspicion of involvement of the state authorities in facilitating, covering or sharing the benefits obtained from such illegal practices?
If there were only one case, explaining it through individual mistakes might be acceptable.
Unfortunately, we see a true pattern, shared by the most powerful European countries. It involves huge amounts of money, intentionally breach for long periods of time some of the most important European laws, corruption, and favouring foreign powers, declared adversaries of the European project.
It would be futile to believe that all this happens without the knowledge and tacit acceptance of the leadership of these great European powers.
What is even more painful is to see how Germany, the Netherlands or France, with the help of some Romanians, marked Romania on the map of Europe as “the homeland of corruption”. This, while hundreds of billions, which fuel terrorism, arms, drugs, and people trafficking, or that keep entire regions of the globe underdeveloped, are passed from one bank account to another bank account through the largest and most respectable European financial institutions, and when the frauds are proven, the scandal goes out silently, through an agreement between lawyers.
Starting from the Bible verse, “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her”, I wonder for how long we will be blind to EU’s hypocrisy and the double standard whih has become the rule?
It is time for everyone to solve their own problems and not everyone to be concerned only with Romania’s problems, un-doubtful real, but incomparably smaller than others.
Few people remember the first anti-corruption report released by the European Commission at the level of all EU member states in 2014, which shows that Western states are facing serious problems within their own borders. For example, we find there Germany with a 13% underground economy (the equivalent of over $ 487 billion, two and a half as much as the entire GDP of Romania at that time!). In reality, “underground economy” is just a synonym for “corruption”. Meanwhile, in 2017, 41% of Germans were convinced, according to the European Corruption Barometer, that corruption is rare or non-existent in their country.
It is obvious that some are very effective in projecting a false image of perfection, both inside and out. The fact that Berlin and Bucharest are just talking about corruption in Romania, although the billions of euros washed by Deutsche Bank are more damaging to the EU than anything can happen in Bucharest, contributes to this false perception of cleanliness.
Just as a German, Dutch or French citizen has the right to know the problems and the level of corruption in another Member State, so a Romanian should know the real situation in other countries. It’s not a curiosity. It is our interest, given that reality has often proved how a small group of Member States has a decisive influence on European policies that affect us all. Certainly I will continue with a future article detailing the different European policies, how they are elaborated and influenced, and especially how these policies affect the Romanians. Let’s not be naive to think that bringing Romania to a corner comes from a pure and altruistic desire to respect a common set of values. Beyond the facade, there are financial interests, sustained and maintained by financial gains from high level corruption, and the need to maintain a status quo in which some dictate and others execute.
It is also the time that the major cases of corruption, of EU legislation breaching, some of which I mentioned above, despite the constant effort to minimize them (although directly involving money and benefits for businesses and individuals), are being analysed from the point of view of the effects.
When hundreds of billions are involved, the implications cross the borders of a single country. The neighbourhood, defence and security policies of an entire continent are endangered.
These are not pure speculations. The links clearly appear in the various investigation reports. The best example is the August 2018 document by BaFin (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany), which analyses Deutsche Bank’s progress. One year after Deutsche Bank’s huge fine for money laundering, it continues to have major downsides in preventing money laundering and terrorist financing.
Terrorism and money laundering do not happen accidentally in the same phrase. Let us not forget that terrorism is the problem constantly pointed out by 500 million Europeans as the main cause of concern in recent years. After the defeat of ISIS in Syria and Iraq, the first and most important step that should be taken to prevent this plague from reappearing in other parts of the world is cutting off funding sources. And ISIS’s main source of funding comes from the same organized crime networks that use EU’s banks as they please. It is obvious that loundering hundreds of billions of euros does not only finance the pleasures of oligarchs but also the needs of terrorist organizations.
Unfortunately, these cases of corruption and infringement of EU legislation are not just about banks. It is very fresh in memory the GasGate example, which linked Gazprom to Germany through preferential gas prices for some and overloading others. The investigation was conducted by DG Competition, concluded in 2018, and is a vivid proof of how illegal practices affect Europe’s energy security, not just the effectiveness of the fight against terrorism.
Furthermore, as many of these files involve Russia, whether it is black money or gas, we no longer have to wonder about Moscow’s strong influence within the EU. Hundreds of billions of euros transferred from one account to another, gas sold cheaper to the stronger and more expensive to the weaker – all of this not only bring vulnerabilities to an entire continent but also buys goodwill, votes, or successfully shuts down investigations.
Those who are left to hold the sack are the smallest, simple citizens or less influential European states. If we want the EU project to have a solid future, the rules must be equal for all and in practice, not just on paper. Romania has a profound interest in supporting the European project because the well-being of the Romanians depends to a large extent on the success of the EU. That is why Romania and the Romanians have a rightful voice in calling for the cessation of the artificial stigma of our country and the courageous approach of the big files that have been gathering for years and are well kept behind closed doors in Brussels, Berlin, Amsterdam or Paris.
Maybe the Romanians are cooking their own goose. We know that Romania still has enough problems to solve internally to become a good foreign partner. We all need to be aware of this reality and most of all to take the necessary steps to solve the problems. But the effort must belong to us and must not come from outside.
In the same time, hundreds of millions of euros laundered, undermining Europe’s energy security or sabotaging the fight against terrorism, are harming both the Romanians and the other 480 million Europeans. It is time for the artificial noise of false talks to stop and the really serious problems that compromise the entire European construction to be tackled.”