Connect with us


EUROPEAN ELECTIONS 2014. Schulz, Juncker or Verhofstadt? Who wants closer ties with the U.S.? CALEAEUROPEANA.RO ANALYSIS on the political agendas of those who have the chance to lead EU




The electoral campaign has started – and so have the promises of change and better perspectives of the European citizen’s life. has analysed the plans of the three main candidates to the leadership of the European Commission. A better understanding of their vision upon how and towards what the EU must be lead could eventually help you in making up your mind and taking a decision, before going to vote. Because – ”This time, it’s different”, so promises the European Parliament, following the line chosen for the promotion of the 2014 European Elections, between 22 – 25 of May. Why? Many may ask themselves. Because there come in force the norms of the 2009 Lisbon Treaty. Because these are the very first European Elections organized following the signing of this treaty. Because, despite the growing number of the EU member-states, with Croatia at July 1st, 2013, the number of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) is still the same, of 751 – or, better said, of 750 plus 1, this 1 counting as the President of the European Parliament, according to the Lisbon Treaty. Because, even though there are still controversies concerning the legitimacy of these elections, when it comes to the real representation of the citizens in the EP, no one can deny the fact that, once with this new treaty, the EU Treaty, or the Lisbon Treaty, the number of attributes of the European Parliament has significantly increased. And this leads, inevitably, to a more democratic EU and to the process of democratization at the EU level.


If, until now, the citizens had the power only to elect their euro-deputies, in order to be represented by these, for a five year mandate, starting with 2014, the European citizens elect as well, indirectly, the one to lead the European institution meant to supervise the word of the treaty, the ”guardian of the treaty”, as the European Commission is more popularly known as. A big step forward, when it comes to the EU democracy, an even bigger challenge to the main three candidates to the European Commission Presidency, whose political programs become, these days, reasons of ardent debates. Thing which is not to be surprising, given the importance of these elections; the winner will be one of the most prominent figures of the European Union.


Martin Schulz: a left leadership for a Social Europe

As it was expected, the main left candidate for the Presidency of the European Commission focuses a lot on the political aspects regarding the “change of the right wing and the come-back to the left leadership”. The recent economic crisis of the last five years of mandate of the European People’s Party, taking into consideration the great number of right MEPs of the 2009 – 2014 mandate, represents the main form of attack of the social-democrats, in their fight with the right wing. The Manifesto launched by the PES, on whose principles the main programmatic ideas of the candidate Martin Schulz are based, are developed along three main concepts: progress, protection and performances, meant to cover the main problematic domains of the current European Union.

banner 2

The priorities stated under the line of “A Union that progresses” are directly linked to the creation of jobs, for these to be the main worry of the socialists, followed by the economical relaunch, the putting of the financial sector at the service of the citizens and the real economy, and the open-up towards a Social Europe. The emphasis particularly comes on the young side of the European citizens, the ones who, according to PES, have no fault for the current economic crisis, although, in the end, they are the ones who suffer most because of it, due to the big number of unemployed following the study years, with no job perspectives. Simultaneously, the left ideology comes to life through the type of politics they promote, particularly in the section dedicated to the Social Europe. Beyond the politics concerning the economical relaunch promised by the PES, of the reinforcement of the Euro zone, so that the current mistakes are never again repeated, of the protection of the citizens in front of the banking politics, the left ideology really shows up in the promises they make to the electorate: the support of the social housing, the creation of new jobs for the in-need ones, the assistance of the social politics, the equal and just redistribution of the incomes and of the welfare. The support of the middle class is, this way, directly stated, through these priorities, under the section of the Union that progresses.

The concept of “protection” and the one of the “Union that protects” have in their structure slogans like the Union of equality and of women rights, of diversity and of a safe and healthy lifestyle of all of us. If the Union of equality and of women rights promotes, first of all, the equality between people, no matter the sex, religion, race or colour etc., as well as the women right to non-violence or any other type of aggression, be it physical, verbal, sexual etc., the Union of diversity continues in the same way, towards the promotion of diversity of any kind and type. The socialists promote thus a politics of opening, of innovation, of new towards more, helping this way at the creation of the idea that only this type of open mentality and of acceptance of new politics and psychologies can lead towards a better, new type of Europe. At last, the Union of a safe and healthy life for all of us goes on with the type of openness previously stated, following this time the idea of health politics, of safe food and safe products, of data protection and of respect of the citizens’ rights, firmly condemning the organized crime and the human traffic phenomena.

Last, but not least, the third concept supported by the socialists, the one of “performance” and of “A Union that performs”, promotes the idea of more participation and more democracy, of a green Europe and the spread of Europe’s influence in the world. If the idea of participation and democracy particularly direct one’s thought towards the European Elections of the 22 – 25 May, this being the main thing on which the socialist emphasis falls on, thus advancing, once again, the promise of a democratization process of the European Union larger and larger, the green Europe concept has at its base the new type of energy supposed for the European future, promoting, at the same type, politics meant to reduce noxes and gas, as closest to zero as possible, as soon as possible. Not in the least, the promotion of Europe’s influence in the world has its origins in the old mentality of the Europeans, the one of leaders, once upon a time, of knowledge and, by this, of the world itself, so that, in the 21st century, Europe wants to re-become the model of values and of democracy that once used to be, for the entire humanity.

In a short form, all these 10 ideas are found in the short-list program of Martin Schulz, written under the form of 10 main ideas which will change Europe. Following strictly the idea of the group’s and party’s ideology, I can only notice the fact that the first part of the PES program is the only one in which one can find ideas of socialist origin, through the protection of the middle-class and the support of the assistance politics. The rest of seven are ideas or actual problems which the European Union has to confront and, by this, its citizens as well, so that the solutions that the social-democrats come up with in its support are not necessarily of left ideology origins, but more of ways of solving these problems according to the actual EU challenges. Martin Schulz recommends himself, thus, as the left candidate whose way of solving problems resides in more cohesion, more acceptance and more diversity – concepts not necessarily of left nature, in an European Union whose political families seem to grow further and further from the ideology that gave birth to them.

Jean-Claude Juncker: Economical relaunch, close relationship with the US


The political program of the EPP candidate, Jean-Claude Juncker, doesn’t change much in substance and content when it comes to the ideas launched by the socialist candidate Martin Schulz. The job problem, especially for the young people, the one of a green, independent from the East gas Europe, capable to have its own resources, next to the reinforcement of the Euro zone, after a long period of recession dramatically felt within the EU, all these are themes more or less common, previously found on the socialist Schulz’s agenda as well. Nonetheless, the distinction that Juncker comes with, among the five points enounced as his priorities, as the possible future President of the European Commission, are strictly related to the EU partnership with the US and, a totally distinguishing point on his agenda, to the coming-up with a solution, when it comes to the problem raised by the United Kingdom in the EU.

banner 3

If, for his first specific point, the one with the US partnership, Juncker claims the necessity of a closer relationship with the west ally of Europe, when it comes to the UK, Juncker shows himself available to accept certain positions, the classical “opting-out”s that the UK has even nowadays, and which are meant to be continued, despite the pressure that Brussels brings on for the unification of the Euro-zone and with regards to the Schengen area. “The other EU countries will have to accept that the UK will never participate in the euro, even if we may regret this”, says Juncker, supporting his statements according to which he will make everything he can, as President of the European Commission, in case of his election, in order to maintain the UK within the EU, to which he adds “We have to accept that the UK will not become a member of the Schengen area.” Such a clear position as this one shows, at the same time, his weakness in front of the British Crown. The United Kingdom of Great Britain is the only state which is so highly mentioned into an otherwise well-established political program, announced by Juncker as his five main priorities – thing which can be very well received by the British people, nationalists by definition, and yet not so well seen by other states, perhaps just as important, if not more, as the UK, when it comes to economical, financial, political or social aspects, without ‘receiving’ the same distinction within a political program.

Having a look at the political manifesto of EPP as it is, we may easily find the same great themes and domains of interest, as we did in the PSE case, just differently sentenced this time – and, having an even closer look to details, after a first, fast lecture of some political priorities, it is exactly this type of information, related to their structure and to the way they are formulated, that differ, according to one’s ideology and which, in the end, are written in the right ideology language. The problem concerning the jobs, of the unemployed, of the reinforcement of the economic situation, of the strengthening of the Euro, of the data protection and of the civil liberties, of the safe and healthy life of the European citizen, of the necessity of making the EU borders safer and stronger, as well as the extension of the EU influence upon the neighbouring areas, precisely in order to assure these borders, all these are problems that the Union, generally speaking, has to face and whose resolving is imperative, no matter the ideological perspective that the future President of the European Commission will have. The difference comes, though, from the way the solutions are formulated, according to the two type of politics and ideologies: if left counts more on the cohesion aspect, by “holding together to one another” and by self-helping, without making good use of the external factor, it is precisely this policy of openness towards the West, this strategic partnership that EPP suggests, for a closer relationship with the US and therefore the creation of a larger gap between the EU and Russia, which make the difference between right and left. The right ideology was always the one to promote the openness, the change, the innovation, the economical partnerships, aspects which are also met in the EPP politics, as well as Juncker’s. This, next to the protection of the European citizens, the support and the spread of the EU democracy and values in the neighbouring area, the zero tolerance shown towards criminality and human traffic, all these consolidate the political program of EPP in its basic aspects, so managing to cover the main interest areas, from the economical and financial one, to the social and the foreign affairs one, thus managing to bring into attention the most important problematic points the EU faces today.


Guy Verhofstadt: ”The unique plan of salvation” and the Commission Reform

Guy Verhofstadt’s program, the ALDE proposed president for the Presidency of the European Commission, opens up in a more than original manner, by exposing some slide-shows meant to illustrate the European and global situation from economical, financial, digital, social etc. perspectives. By illustrating the main problems that the EU faces, as well as the perspectives from what points these problems are analysed, particularly the ones which belong to certain ideological factions, Verhofstadt suggests in the end a “unique plan of salvation”, following the Delors method, proposed by he himself, through which he promises to bring to salvation and the prosperity of Europe, without over-imposing or over-taxing a too weak Union, following the 2009 – 2014 recession wave.

banner 4

Even so, having a look upon the priorities that Verhofstadt states, the solutions he comes up with, as possible future President of the European Commission, are not very distinct from the ones previously suggested by his competitors, the socialist Schulz and the popular Juncker. Written, when it comes to the structure and to the style, as the ones announced by the socialists, they remind one, from their content aspect, by what the popular support, in the EPP manifesto. The stabilization of the economical sector, the growing number of the jobs, the private data protection and the one of the civil rights, a European Commission meant to govern for real, these are the three main points announced in the Verhofstadt program, points that remind one for good of the challenges that the European Union faces nowadays. If the first two priorities are problems found in the programs of the other two candidates as well, the economical stabilization, the creation of new jobs, particularly for young people, the energetic independence of Europe, the strengthening of the Euro zone, the data protection and the civil rights, as well as the better safety of the UE borders and the promotion of Euro anti-discrimination law, all these being themes identified and promoted as well by socialists and populars, the third point, the one of the European Commission that governs indeed, is a distinguished and distinguishing point on the Verhofstadt list, meant somehow to illustrate the atypical personality of this candidate.

Signalizing thus a premiere, when it comes to political programs, Verhofstadt is the first, out of the three main candidates, that discusses the governance problem within the Commission and within the EU, supporting the idea of a better governance at a European level, efficient and effective at the same time. As a main target towards everything that currently happens at the EU level, Verhofstadt militates first of all for an intense promotion of the legislative initiative the Commission currently has, and thus of fulfilling for good and for real the role of government it has.  His second idea is directly linked to the three working places of the EU institutions in Luxembourg, Bruxelles and Strasbourg, supporting the idea of a single working place, by this helping the EU economy, according to the data Verhofstadt gives us, with £150 millions per year, next to the 20.000 tones of gas emanated in the atmosphere, assuring at the same time a better cohesion between the working groups. At last, in the third subpoint, Verhosfadt suggests a redistribution of the current working groups, so that there is more efficiency and more clarity in the Commission work. The suggestion the ALDE candidate comes up with is the one of separating the groups into departments, so that each gets distributed according to its specific, in such a way that there is the group of the President, the one of Energy, Clime and Innovation, the one of Economical, Financial and Monetary Affairs, the one of Foreign Affairs and, in the end, the one of Justice and Fundamental Rights, each having in its structure the specific domains. With this new proposal, as well as with his entire point three of the political program, Verhofstadt manages thus to innovate, to bring something new on the political scene, exactly the way he is build, as a political personality, as well as an ALDE leader: the “atypical” attribute in everything he does.


Schulz, Juncker, Verhofstadt. Socialists, populars, liberals. Beyond these simple concepts, though, behind these political personalities, there are real programmatic structures, of ideological nature, consisting into ways these groups best know and perceive as the best ways of having Europe out of crisis. A single thing is for sure: Europe needs to be reconstructed – and not only economically, although this is the thing that impacts most and, why to hide it?, affects most. But the economical aspect is not the only weak point of the Union, in this very moment – and the grand political families know this too well. The way in which this reconstruction will come, though, is the great unknown factor in the equation of the 22 – 25 of May European elections. And it is, at the same time, one of the most important unknown factors in the history of the elections for the European Parliament. Its result is indeed grand; beyond all these lines promoted by the European Parliament in order to bring people to vote, beyond all these political propaganda addressed to people by the candidates themselves, beyond the promises they make now, on the edge of the elections, the ideologies that stand their opinions can be found in their political programs as well. The elements exist, there is no way to be denied. Will the ideology win, though, once confronted with the popularity of one candidate or another? Will the messages supported by one or another be the ones that will truly decide who the President of the European Commission is, for the next five years? A great issue of the voting system is the fact that one may almost never know for good why a candidate was opted for, instead of the other. Should it be the sympathy for one? The antipathy towards another? The lack of a better option? The hope one has in the political messages of a certain one or another? Hard to say, particularly in the euphoria of the winning of such an electoral race, with a huge point at stake for the next five years. It would be interesting to follow such a theme. Chances are, it won’t happen. Again, a huge point is at stake… and the winner will be too busy to take his prize, following such a hard campaign, while the others will have to lift their heads and get back to work, again from the “opposite” side. The European Union has to be rebuild, no matter what; the way this will happen, be it left or right, be it socialist, popular or liberal, be it through itself or, on the contrary, through the call of the ancient allies of Europe, this we will only know following May 25th.






Apostolos Tzitzikostas, EPP candidate, elected as new President of the European Committee of Regions: “Together, we must make our Committee the bridge between Europe and its citizens”



© Apostolos Tzitzikostas Twitter

Governor of the Region of Central Macedonia and EPP CoR member, Apostolos Tzitzikostas,  was elected as new President of the European Committee of Regions.

“Together, we must make our Committee the bridge between Europe and its citizens”, transmitted the new CoR president in his speech.


Apostolos Tzitzikostas wants a change of the European Committee of the Regions and presented to the new colleagues a plan based on three pillars: Modernizing the administration, a focused dialogue between citizens and the European Union and establishing an agenda in order to ”make this Committee the point of reference in the European Union.”

The February 2020 plenary session represents the inaugural session for the European Committee of the Regions’ seventh’ term of office.

The European Committee of the Regions is the EU’s assembly of regional and local representatives. Since 1994 its mission has been to represent and promote the interests of local and regional authorities in relation to the European decision-making process. From its Brussels headquarters, the European Committee of the Regions has thus helped to ensure ever closer union of the European nations and territories with decisions being taken at the closest possible level to ordinary Europeans, in line with the subsidiarity principle.

The New Mandate

CoR members and alternates are appointed for 5 years, which is the length of a CoR mandate. The next mandate starts on 26 January 2020 and will last until 25 January 2025. At the beginning of a new mandate, all CoR members have to be appointed, and all organs, including the Bureau, the commissions, the working groups, and the interregional groups have to be re-established. A new President, a new First vice-President and a new Bureau are elected by the members meeting in the first plenary session.

Continue Reading


Head of Romanian EPP MEPs responds to S&D Group leader: Treat Romania differently. You cannot compare PSD’s attacks against the rule of law with EPP Government measures



© European Parliament Media Center

The actions undertaken against the rule of law by the former Social-Democrat governments in Romania cannot be compared with recent measures announced by the centre-right government, member of EPP family, says MEP Rareș Bogdan, head of the Romanian delegation within the EPP Group in the European Parliament.

In an exclusive statement for CaleaEuropeană.ro, Bogdan responded to critics drawn by Iratxe Garcia, leader of the Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament. In a Twitter post earlier on Monday, Garcia said EPP Romanian government should take note of Venice Commission, which prohibits changing the electoral law one year ahead of the elections.

The Spaniard MEP advised the Romanian Government against going the ”same path as Poland and Hungary” in ”undermining the rule of law”.

In his reaction, Rareș Bogdan mentioned that we would ask for a discussion with ”Mrs. Garcia to clarify that her statement was made without knowing the reality in Romania and the steps taken by the Orban government”.

“I think there is no bad will, but a simply less unfortunate information about the situation in Romania”, he replied.

”There is no term of comparison” between PSD and PNL, said Bogdan, ”although both parties are from Romania”.

”You cannot compare the continuous attack of PSD against Romania’s strategic partnerships with the EU and the US, against the rule of law (…) with the natural, logical and normal proposal of PNL, using constitutional tools, to introduce a two rounds vote for the local elections in June 2020. The purpose of our proposal is to enhance the representativeness and legitimacy of the elected local politician. By introducing a two rounds election we do not reduce, in any case, electoral rights”, explained the head of the Romanian delegation in the EPP Group.

Moreover, Rareș Bogdan asked that the situation in Romania to be treated ”differently”, considering Garcia’s comparison with the situations in Poland and Hungary.

“My request is that our colleagues in the European Parliament treat Romania as a different situation. Also, pay close attention to the statements of the leaders in Bucharest, led by President Klaus Iohannis and the right-wing Prime Minister Ludovic Orban, who have no connection with the statements made by Romanian officials at the head of the Government or Parliament in the period 2017-2019”, said Bogdan.


Continue Reading


Take part in the #EUCanBeatCancer campaign. EPP group urge the Member States to join forces and fight cancer together



© EPP/ Facebook

EPP Group, the largest political family in the European Parliament, is launching a cancer awareness campaign, the disease that causes one of four deaths in Europe.

Through #EUCanBeatCancer campaign, the EPP group calls for better cooperation between research centers in Europe, more money for cancer research, but also fair and accessible care across Europe for citizens.

© EPP/ Facebook

How can you get involved in the #EUCanBeatCancer campaign

You can join the 1537 citizens already registered in the campaign through 4 simple steps:

  1. You subscribe using the email address HERE
  2. Follow the #EUCanBeatCancer campaign on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter
  3. Use the Twibbon  in the profile picture
  4. Draw the Twibbon symbol and post it in order to show support

Everyone has their own story about cancer, even European politicians or leaders:








According to the World Health Organization, one third of cancers are preventable and half of the deaths could be prevented.

Breast cancer is the second most common form of cancer in Romania and in many cases the disease is detected when it is already in an advanced stage.

According to the private health network, Regina Maria, in Romania, 80% of breast cancers are diagnosed in the advanced phase, a stage in which the treatment can not bring healing, but only prolong the survival.

Romania had the lowest rates  (0.2% of women aged 50-69 – 2015) in breast cancer screening.


Our multimedia platform – Calea Europeana – has joined the #EUCanBeatCancer campaign. During the campaign informative articles will be published and we will keep you updated with the measures taken at European level to beat cancer.

© CaleaEuropeana


Continue Reading